Magana v. Hofbauer’s Empirical Analysis
263 F.3d 542 · 2001
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Bullock v. Carver (2002), Moss v. United States (2003)
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Hill v. Lockhart · Rose v. Lee · United States v. Morrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to satisfy the “prejudice” requirement in a plea agreement context, “the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the state court identifies the correct governing legal principle from [the Supreme] Court's decisions but unreasonably applies that principle to the facts of the prisoner's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Dyer III v. Bowlen“does not require certainty or even a preponderance of the evidence that the outcome would have been different with effective assistance of counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.