Coleman v. Kemna’s Empirical Analysis
263 F.3d 785 · 2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on William O'sullivan v. Darren Boerckel · Ford v. Georgia · Dixon v. Dormire · State v. Coleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] state procedural rule only prevents federal review where it is 'a firmly established and regularly followed state practice.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“because the State has not previously'strictly or regularly' relied on the default of this state procedure to bar federal review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Caspari
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.