Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

263 F. App'x 338

Goodwater v. Astrue

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 4, 2008

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-02-04

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Craig v. Chater

Decided 2008-02-04

PER CURIAM:

¶1Angela Goodwater appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the *339Commissioner’s termination of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Goodwater v. Astrue, No. 0:05-cv-03480-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/263/fappx/338 · .json · Public domain