Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

263 F. App'x 430

United States v. Delgado-Aranda

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 30, 2008

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-01-30

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Almendarez-Torres v. United States · United States v. Pineda-Arrellano · McFarling v. Monsanto Co.

Decided 2008-01-30

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Guadalupe Delgado-Aranda raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cik. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.

/263/fappx/430 · .json · Public domain