Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 FRD 378 - Buettgen v. Harless

Buettgen v. Harless’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 2018
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc. · Irma Jean James · Stirman v. Exxon Corp. · In re Donnkenny Inc. Securities Litigation · 3 F. Supp. 2d 286 - In Re Olsten Corp. Securities Litig.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Like the Buettgen Group, the Lyman Group has provided no rationale for this grouping other than to manufacture the greatest financial interest in order to be appointed lead plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.