Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 FSUPP 218 - Frankel v. Gardner

Frankel v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 1975
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395A (§ 1802 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 410 (§ 210 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 426 (§ 226 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees · Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Conference Committees Etal., Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern Carriers Conference Committees Etal., Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Union Pacific Railroad · 240 F. Supp. 325 - Fiumara v. Texaco, Inc. · 263 F. Supp. 184 - Weiss v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In connection with my application for hospital insurance entitlement I certify that I am not now, and during the last 12 months have not been a member of any organization which is required to register under the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended, as a Communist-action organization, a Communist-front organization, or a Communist infiltrated organization.” 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Are you now a member of any organization which is required to register under the Internal Security Act of 1950 as a Communist-action organization, a Communist-front organization, or a Communist-infiltrated organization?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.