Nasso v. Seagal’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1450 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Upon removal, the orders entered by the state court are treated as though they had been entered by the federal court.... Because the ‘Rooker-Feld-man doctrine does not work to defeat a district court’s authority over the management of its own case,’ even where the exercise of such management ‘has the secondary effect of voiding a state court determination,’ the doctrine does not preclude this Court from reviewing orders that were entered prior to removal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.