Hendrick v. Aramark Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681N
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Fw/pbs Inc II v. City of Dallas Mjr Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When considering ... a facial challenge, a court must apply the same standard of review that would apply on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Well-pleaded factual allegations are taken as true, and reasonable inferences are drawn in the plaintiff's favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.