In re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins · 7 Cal. 4th 1 - Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]ithout disclosure of private information to a third party, it hardly matters that '[a]ctions to remedy ... invasions of privacy, intrusion upon seclusion, and nuisance have long been heard by American courts, and the right of privacy is recognized by most states.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a plaintiff need not show actual loss to establish standing for common-law claims of invasion of privacy and intrusion upon seclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“both history and the judgment of Congress play important roles”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.