Hailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2019
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rummel v. Estelle · State v. Hendrixson · Grant v. State · Hargrove v. State · Mays v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“while there is some evidence to support appellant’s allegation of selective prosecution, that evidence is insufficient under both the intentional discrimination standard adopted by this court in State v. Causey, 246 Ga. 735 (2) ( 273 SE2d 6 ) (1980), and the disparate treatment standard utilized in State v. Russell, 477 NW2d 886 (Minn. 1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Stephens v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.