Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 Ga. 23 - Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
5
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Barnes v. State (1998), Humphreys v. State (2010)

6 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

1901993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Collier v. State · Dampier v. State · Blankenship v. State · Rainwater v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he problem [as] how to determine which of two or more felonies should merge where: (1) as here, the jury specifies two or more as underlying a felony murder conviction; or (2) where the jury does not specify which are underlying felonies, but the evidence shows, and the jury convicts the defendant, of two or more felonies which could serve to support a felony murder conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “there is no logical rule to be applied in making a determination regarding the jury's intent. Accordingly, there is, in these circumstances, an ambiguity which must be construed in the defendant's favor. [Cit.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “that where it is unclear which of two or more felonies is the underlying felony for a felony murder conviction, the trial court must merge the most severe (in terms of potential punishment).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.