Martin v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Dolinger v. Driver (1998), Kuriatnyk v. Kuriatnyk (2010)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. Klem · Bank of Cumming v. Moseley · Tennis v. Hinch · 166 Ga. App. 567 - Sunn v. Mercury Marine · Executive Jet Sales, Inc. v. Jet America, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here an appeal is taken under any provision of subsection (a) ... of this Code section, all judgments, rulings, or orders rendered in the case which are raised on appeal and which may affect the proceedings below shall be reviewed and determined by the appellate court, without regard to the appealability of the judgment, ruling, or order standing alone and without regard to whether the judgment, ruling, or order appealed from was final or was appealable by some other express provision of law contained in this Code section, or elsewhere.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Consistent with its requirement that appellate courts address only those rulings that "may affect the proceedings below," OCGA § 5-6-34 (d) expressly provides that "[n]othing in this * subsection shall require the appellate court to pass upon questions which are rendered moot." The general rule is that appellate courts do not consider moot questions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“liberally applied § 5-6-34 (d) so as to permit an order that is not directly appealable by itself to be appealed along with a separate, directly appealable order”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.