263 Ga. App. 266 - Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 242 Ga. App. 228 - State v. Winnie · Tibbs v. Tibbs · 245 Ga. App. 531 - Kent v. State · 263 Ga. App. 70 - Welch v. State · 240 Ga. App. 139 - Howden v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Georgia the “continuing witness” objection is based on the notion that written testimony is heard by the jury when read from the witness stand just as oral testimony is heard when given from the witness stand. But, it is unfair and places undue emphasis on written testimony for the writing to go out with the jury to be read again during deliberations, while oral testimony is received but once. 6”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.