263 Ga. App. 367 - Rowe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State · Farley v. State · Stephens v. State · 255 Ga. App. 390 - Glass v. State · 254 Ga. App. 579 - Schwindler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Williams v. State, 261 Ga. 640, 642 (2) (b) ( 409 SE2d 649 ) (1991), outlined the three showings the State must make to admit a similar transaction. First, the State must identify a proper purpose for admitting the transaction; second, the State must show that the accused committed the separate offense; and third, the State must show a sufficient similarity between the independent offense and the crime charged so that proof of the former tends to prove the latter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mullis v. State“we do not find it necessary to address specifically and individually each of [Bly’s ten] instances of challenged trial tactics. We simply note that the decisions on which witnesses to call,. . . how to conduct cross-examinations, what motions to file, and what objections to make are strategic decisions that, after thorough investigation and client consultation, are virtually unchallengeable and do not require a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Evidence of an earlier assault on a woman is material to the issue of consent or the lack thereof, and has a direct bearing on appellant’s bent of mind. Such evidence would tend to rebut appellant’s claim of consent by establishing that appellant has a propensity to initiate or continue an encounter without a woman’s consent. Such evidence also corroborates the victim’s testimony that appellant acted in the manner charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.