McSweeney v. Buti’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2020
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 81 Ill. 2d 317 - Finley v. Finley · 89 Ill. 2d 232 - Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Zarkin · 156 Ill. 2d 288 - McDunn v. Williams · 134 Ill. App. 3d 48 - Peskin v. Deutsch · 80 Ill. App. 3d 860 - Schlossberg v. Corrington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The language of the holding warrants clarification. While the circuit court judge articulates the language of voiding the sale, the sale was not voided. The circuit court's order states,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The sole issue at trial is the actual value at the time of the purchase by the defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.