Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 Ind. 690 - May v. State

May v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2007

22 state decisions

1001975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blackburn v. State · Langley v. State · Chatman v. State · Davis v. State · May v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is true that the trial court is required to make findings of facts sufficient to enable this Court to dispose of the issues presented on appeal. Davis v. State (1975), [263] Ind. [327], 330 N.E.2d 738 ; Love v. State (1971), 257 Ind. 57 , 272 N.E.2d 456 . It is also true that the judge’s finding of fact on this issue was subject to the same criticism as were the findings in Davis, supra. However, as in Davis , there is another factor which precludes a determination of reversible error — the allegations contained in the second paragraph quoted above are not supported by any testimony produced at the hearing. Thus, no issue was presented to- the court, and the only finding that could have been forthcoming was that the petitioner failed to carry his burden upon that specific issue. Such a finding would not have benefited the petitioner, and its absence was not prejudicial. 338 N.E.2d at 259-260 . (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.