State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Micheaux v. Amalgamated Meatcutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local P-94 · State v. Freeman · State v. Bickford · State v. Hermes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[t]here is no statutory authority for the State to appeal from the dismissal in a criminal case of some of the counts of a multiple-count complaint, information, or indictment while the case remains pending before the district court on all or a portion of the remaining counts which have not been dismissed and which have not been finally resolved.” State v. Nelson, 263 Kan. 115 , Syl. ¶ 3, 946 P.2d 1355 (1997).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Phelps
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.