State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably State v. Pabst (2000), State v. Holmes (2004)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Mullins Coal Co. v. Director · Schiro v. Clark · State v. Timley · State v. Ruebke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"At any time after the defendant has been charged with a crime and before pronouncement of sentence, the defendant, the defendant's counsel or the prosecuting attorney may request a determination of the defendant's competency to stand trial. If, upon request of either party or upon the judge's own knowledge and observation, the judge before whom the case is pending finds that there is reason to believe that the defendant is incompetent to stand trial the proceedings shall be suspended and a hearing conducted to determine the competency of the defendant." (Emphasis added.) K.S.A. 22-3302(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Davis““The dealing of lethal blows after the deceased fell and [was] rendered helpless. Reading it seems to me that is significant in this case. To me, if this man had suffered one stab wound that caused his death, that that would be — that would suggest to me because there was no premeditation — that there was one intentional stab wound, that diere was no premeditation; however, the fact here is he suffered four wounds at different times. To me, diat is significant, that those who attacked the deceased here intendfed] to kill him and did somediing that suggests there was premeditation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Navarro““ “Where the sufficiency of the evidence of a criminal case is challenged on appeal, the standard of review is whether, after review of all the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” State v. White, 263 Kan. 283, 293 , 950 P.2d 1316 (1997) (quoting State v. Orr, 262 Kan. 312 , Syl. ¶ 10, 940 P.2d 42 [1977]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cravatt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.