Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 Kan. 370 - State v. Clark

State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Moncla · State v. Johnson · State v. Basker · State v. Earsery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]rrors that do not affirmatively cause prejudice to the substantial rights of the complaining party do not require reversal when substantial justice has been done.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.