State v. Wonders’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably State v. Clark (2001), In re L.A. (2001)
67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Mincey v. Arizona · Texas v. Brown · Sedillo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'have a lawful right of access to the object.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““When a motion to suppress evidence is filed, the State bears the burden of proving to the trial court the lawfulness of the search and seizure. State v. Damm, 246 Kan. 220, 222 , 787 P.2d 1185 (1990) (citing Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 390-91 , 57 L. Ed. 2d 290 , 98 S. Ct. 2408 [1978]). If the findings of the trial court on a motion to suppress evidence are based on substantial evidence, the appellate court must not substitute its view of the evidence for that of the trial court. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Wonders, 263 Kan. 582, 588-89 , 952 P.2d 1351 (1998).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Payne““The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Slater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.