Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 Kan. 650 - Gillespie v. Seymour

Gillespie v. Seymour’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company · Gillespie v. Seymour · National Labor Relations Board v. Textile Workers Union · Alley v. Tennessee · St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance v. International Playtex, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Definition. A judgment is the final determination of the rights of the parties in an action. “(b) Judgment upon multiple claims. When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction, any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘Even if a section 254(b) certificate is issued, it is not binding on appeal; the trial court cannot thereby make an order final and therefore appealable, if it is not in fact final.’ Elliott, Survey of Kansas Law: Civil Procedure, 27 Kan. L. Rev. 185, 194 (1979) (citing Henderson, 1 Kan. App. 2d 103 ).” 263 Kan. at 655 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.