State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2012
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Chambers v. Maroney · Ker v. State of California · Sedillo v. United States · Harris v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * it is evident that the packet seized from the defendant was admissible in evidence under the ‘plain view’ doctrine. If not, indeed, in ‘hot pursuit,’ the officers had a valid reason for the initial intrusion into defendant’s privacy. He was stopped on suspicion the car he was driving had been stolen, and also in order to issue two traffic citations. The officer ‘came inadvertently across’ the package. In the light of his experience, he had reasonable and probable cause to believe the packet, in its particular shape and size, and in plain view, was contraband. * * * ” [Footnotes omitted]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shipman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.