Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably Von Lusch v. State (1977), 115 Md. App. 549 - Anderson v. Litzenberg (1997)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burgett v. Texas · 9 Md. App. 15 - Metz v. State · 9 Md. App. 166 - Johnson v. State · Fenwick v. United States · Robert v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]n the event of . . . the conviction of such witness of any infamous crime ... in order to prove such conviction it shall not be necessary to produce the whole record of proceedings containing such conviction, but the certificate, under the seal of the clerk of the court wherein such proceedings were had . . . shall be sufficient. No conviction may be used for any purpose under this section when the conviction is being appealed or the time for noting an appeal has not expired.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[W]e do not agree with the view of the Court of Special Appeals that [the] Rule ... means one thing for ‘traditional’ grounds of objection and another for ‘non-traditional’ grounds. Indeed we think it would be difficult from time to time to decide whether a ground of objection was traditional or non-traditional. We see no room in the Rule or in the decisions for making such a distinction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boyd v. State“"We find it impossible from the record to tell what the basis of the objection was."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.