Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 Mich. 484 - Millar v. MacEy Co.

Millar v. MacEy Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 1946
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schurr v. Savigny · Van Fleet v. Van Fleet · In re Moon's Estate · Swarthout v. Lucas · Shaw v. Armstrong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The law in this State seems to be well settled that where an express contract is entered into between parties, but they differ as to the terms thereof, and there is evidence tending to support the claim of each of them, it is for the jury to determine what the terms of the contract were, and there can be no recovery on the quantum meruit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.