Blankertz v. MacK & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1962
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bedell v. Berkey · Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co. · Garrett v. W. S. Butterfield Theatres, Inc. · Boyle v. Preketes · Bremer v. Pleiss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘ ‘ This court is definitely committed to the holding that one going about in public places or semipublic places when possessed of his natural faculties may not escape being charged with negligence if he is heedless of his own safety. If he fails to use the care that an ordinarily careful person would have used in like surroundings, and in consequence sustains injury, he must bear his own misfortune. Bedell v. Berkey, 76 Mich. 435 ( 15 Am. St. Rep. 370 ); Shorkey v. Great A. & P. Tea Co., 259 Mich. 450 ; Garrett v. W. S. Butterfield Theatres, Inc., 261 Mich. 262 ; Boyle v. Preketes, 262 Mich. 629 ; Grand Rapids Bedding Co. v. Grand Rapids Furniture Temple Co., 218 Mich. 486 ; Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co., 254 Mich. 49 . The last-cited case is surely not more conclusive of plaintiff’s contributory negligence incident to an elevator accident than the present case, and plaintiff’s contributory negligence there barred recovery. ’ ’”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Elliott v. Dahl · Brusseau v. Selmo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.