Johnson v. Holzemer’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2001
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. · Hasey v. McMullen · Poppitz v. German Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * While it is true that [by statute], after 6 hours of deliberation by a jury panel, the court may accept the concurring opinion of five-sixths of the members of the panel in civil cases, this does not mean that the deliberation of the panel leading up to such a verdict may be conducted by less than a jury of 12.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“under this constitutional provision the legislature has defined the jury required thereby as `a body of 12.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hamm
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.