¶1On July 7, 1992 the Defendant was sentenced to DC-92-204, eight (8) years for Theft, to be served consecutive to the term given in Silver Bow County.
¶2On July 7, 1992, the Defendant was sentenced to DC-92-216, seven (7) years for Theft, A Common Scheme, to be served consecutive to the term imposed in DC-92-204.
¶3On May 6,1993, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
¶4The Defendant was present and proceeded pro se. The state was not represented.
¶5Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
¶6After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
¶7The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
¶8The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Mr. De Arment for representing himself in this matter.