Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 N.C. 24 - Belk v. Boyce

Belk v. Boyce’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2013

8 state decisions

40196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Luttrell v. . Mineral Co. · Price v. Gray · Rea v. . Simowitz · Drum v. Miller · Wright v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “degree of care required of persons having the possession and control of dangerous explosives, is of the highest. The utmost caution must be used in their care and custody, to the end that harm may not come to others upon coming in contact with them. The degree of care must be commensurate with the dangerous character of the article.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.