Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

263 N.C. 795

Nix v. Earley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1965

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1965-02-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1968

Relies on Blake v. Mallard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-02-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1After careful and full consideration of the evidence, we are of opinion, and so decide, that there is no evidence sufficient to support plaintiff’s allegation that Lonnie Nix was crossing Highway #70 within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection. G.S. 20-173; G.S. 20-174; G.S. 20-38(1).

¶2If it be conceded that the evidence was sufficient to require submission of an issue as to defendant’s actionable negligence, it is manifest, that the negligence of Lonnie Nix was at least one of the proximate causes of his fatal injuries. The only reasonable conclusion to be drawn from the evidence is that Lonnie Nix, notwithstanding he could and should have observed the approach of defendant’s car, walked or ran directly into the path thereof. The applicable legal principles are stated in Blake v. Mallard, 262 N.C. 62, 136 S.E. 2d 214, and cases cited.

¶3On the grounds stated, the judgment of involuntary nonsuit is affirmed.

¶4Affirmed.

/263/nc/795 · .json · Public domain