263 N.J. Super. 237 - Morris v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Lepis v. Lepis · Smith v. Smith · State v. Bryant · Innes v. Innes · 240 N.J. Super. 204 - Finckin v. Finckin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the parties can establish their own standards, and that these standards, where not unwarranted under the circumstances, will be enforced by the court irrespective of the need-based guidelines of Lepis , which are applied when there are no such standards. If circumstances have made the parties' standards unreasonable, they can in extreme cases be modified. Id. at 245-246 , 622 A. 2d 909 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“her claim to equitable distribution and substantially higher alimony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the modification provisions of Lepis would not apply,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.