Hueper v. Goodrich’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2003
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beckman v. Schroeder · Hagen v. Swenson · Koenigs v. Thome · 36 Ill. App. 3d 194 - Offutt v. Pennoyer Merchants Transfer Co. · Rahja v. Current
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is generally not necessary * * * [to] be the most qualified person in his field in order to render his opinions at trial. All that is necessary is that he have some specialized knowledge or training which will be of some assistance to the [trier of fact]. That knowledge may be gained through formal education or through years of occupational experience.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“will not be reversed unless it is based on an erroneous view of the law or is clearly not justified by the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.