Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 S.C. 110 - White v. State

White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Cherry v. State (1989), Johnson v. State (1997)

4 federal appellate · 83 state decisions

36019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · State v. Hicks · State v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there was no reversible error in the trial and that there was not an arguably meritorious ground of appeal, even if notice of intention to appeal had been timely served....” White, 263 S.C. at 119 , 208 S.E.2d at 40 . 2 . Respondent argues that due to Gant , the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.