Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 SO2D 773 - State v. Fabian

State v. Fabian’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
7
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2024

22 state decisions

60197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clewis v. Texas · J. Gordon Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner · 54 Cal. App. 333 - People v. Peete · Breeding v. State · Hauk v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he finding of a dead body in a particular county raises a presumption, or supports an inference, that the killing took place there.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “". . . Aside from any statutory provision, the finding of a body in a county would warrant a finding that the murder was committed in that county. One should not be permitted to escape punishment for murder because he is clever enough to conceal the place where the victim was killed or died. . . ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the court need only determine that there is relevant and competent evidence supporting the allegations of the indictment with respect to venue and that this evidence is sufficient to warrant submission of the issue to the jury for determination. This is true, of course, where countervailing evidence is offered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.