Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

263 So. 3d 252

Mitchell v. State

Decided January 25, 2019

Relies on Dolinger v. State · Green v. State

Decided 2019-01-25

PER CURIAM.

¶1Amarti Mitchell appeals the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after the trial court found he violated condition five of his order of probation for committing a new law violation. We affirm but remand solely for entry of a proper order revoking probation. SeeDolinger v. State, 779 So.2d 419, 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (determining trial court erred by failing to enter a written *253revocation order and remanding for entry of said order); see alsoGreen v. State, 23 So.3d 820, 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (remanding for entry of a written order revoking probation where record clearly showed the trial court had revoked appellant's probation).

¶2AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of revocation order.

¶3ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

/263/so3d/252 · .json · Public domain