Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

263 So. 3d 252

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 25, 2019

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2019-01-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 state decisions

Relies on Tanzi v. State · 961 So. 2d 1036 - Wright v. State · 947 So. 2d 1208 - Johnson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2019-01-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1Travis Walker appeals the denial of his pre-sentencing motion to withdraw his plea. From a thorough review of the record, we find that Walker established good cause in support of his motion and, therefore, reverse.

¶2When good cause is established, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f) entitles the defendant to withdraw his pre-sentence plea. Tanzi v. State, 964 So.2d 106, 113 (Fla. 2007). This "rule should be liberally construed in favor of the defendant because the law inclines toward a trial on the merits." Johnson v. State, 947 So.2d 1208, 1210 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

¶3Under the unique circumstances of this case, we find the trial court abused its discretion in denying Walker's motion to withdraw his plea. SeeWright v. State, 961 So.2d 1036, 1041 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We reverse Walker's conviction and sentence and remand for the trial court to vacate the plea and sentence and to take further actions consistent with this opinion.

¶4REVERSED and REMANDED.

¶5EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

¶6COHEN, J., dissents without opinion.

/263/so3d/252 · .json · Public domain