Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

263 So. 3d 277

Stewart v. State

Decided February 5, 2019

Relies on Anders v. California · Davis v. State · Williams v. State

Decided 2019-02-05

Per Curiam.

¶1*278In these Anders* appeals, we affirm the orders revoking Appellant's probation and imposing sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written orders of revocation to specify the conditions Appellant was found to have violated. SeeDavis v. State , 218 So.3d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (affirming revocation of probation in Anders appeal but remanding for court to enter written revocation order specifying conditions of probation violated). Appellant need not be present. SeeWilliams v. State , 145 So.3d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED .

¶3Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.

¶4Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

/263/so3d/277 · .json · Public domain