Chapman v. Leaverton’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2007
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Olsen · Love v. Keowne · Cargill & Dennis v. Kountze Bros. · Trego v. Skinner · Bay State Iron Co. v. Goodall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While it may be said that the purpose of pure bills of discovery is to provide needed testimony for a suit pending or contemplated, yet it would seem that the suit in the instant case was in the nature of a bill of discovery. * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.