Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 SW3D 405 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 40th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Tibbs v. Florida · Old Chief v. United States · Montgomery v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All persons are presumed to be innocent and no person may be convicted of an offense unless each element of the offense is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.... The presumption of innocence alone is sufficient to acquit the defendant, unless the jurors are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt after careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence in the case. The prosecution has the burden of proving the defendant guilty and it must do so by proving each and every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt and if it fails to do so, you must acquit the defendant. It is not required that the prosecution prove guilt beyond all possible doubt; it is required that the prosecution's proof excludes all reasonable doubt concerning the defendant's guilt. In the event you have a reasonable doubt as to the defendant's guilt after considering all the evidence before you, and these instructions, you will acquit him and say by your verdict "Not Guilty."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “invite the panelists to redefine the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]n attempt to tamper with a witness is evidence of 'consciousness of guilt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.