Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 U.S. 326 - Frick v. Webb

Frick v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

263 U.S. 326 · 1923

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 9 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably Hines v. Davidowitz (1941), Graham v. Richardson (1971)

3 federal appellate · 9 district · 29 state decisions

2401923193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedFrick v. Webb

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · William Truax v. Mike Raich · Truax v. Corrigan · Gulf Ry Co v. Ellis · Allgeyer v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The state has power, and the act evidences its purpose, to deny to ineligible aliens permission to own, lease, use or have the benefit of lands within its borders for agricultural purposes. Webb v. O’Brien, supra, ‘As the state has the power ... to prohibit, it may adopt such measures as are reasonably appropriate or needful to render exercise of that power effective’ (citing cases). It may forbid indirect as well as direct ownership and control of agricultural land by ineligible aliens.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.