Commonwealth v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2012
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · McNeil v. Wisconsin · Arizona v. Roberson · Minnick v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the police do subsequently initiate an encounter in the absence of counsel (assuming there has been no break in custody), the suspect’s statements are presumed involuntary and therefore inadmissible as substantive evidence at trial, even where the suspect executes a waiver and his statements would be considered voluntary under traditional standards. This is ‘designed to prevent police from badgering a defendant into waiving his previously asserted Miranda rights.’ ” McNeil, 501 U.S. at 177 , 111 S.Ct. at 2208 [ quoting Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344, 350 , 110 S.Ct. 1176, 1180 , 108 L.Ed.2d 293 (1990) ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he underlying concern of Miranda, Edwards, and their progeny[:] the coercive atmosphere of custodial interrogation and the state of mind of the suspect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“permit a full opportunity to exercise the privilege against self-incrimination,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.