Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 Va. 58 - Stephens v. Commonwealth

Stephens v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

42 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Missouri v. Hunter · Whalen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “embodies three guarantees: “[i]t protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after aequittai[; i]t protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after convietion[; a]nd it protects against multiple punishments for the same offense.” Virginia’s constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy affords a defendant the same guarantees as the federal Double Jeopardy Clause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the role of the constitutional guarantee is limited to assuring that the court does not exceed its legislative authorization by imposing multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “applies only to a case involving multiple larceny prosecutions predicated upon the theft of multiple articles stolen contemporaneously.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.