Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 263 WIS 307 - Karsten v. Meis

Karsten v. Meis’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1963
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Forbes v. Forbes · Schmidt v. Leuthener · Wenneman v. Royal Indemnity Co. · Landrath v. Allstate Insurance · Masanz v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The evidence established that at the time of trial there had been a complete recovery from all the injuries suffered in the accident. Aside from the pain which appellant suffered during his hospitalization, there is no evidence of pain except in his own testimony, and the doctors could not account for it on the basis of their objective findings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.