¶1We interpret the interlocutory judgment to mean that on tli accounting plaintiff is entitled to one-third of the assets of the partnership afta crediting each partner with the amount of such partner’s capital contribution! As so interpreted, we think the judgment is correct.
¶2The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.
¶3Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
¶4Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.