Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 Ala. 422 - Nelson v. Johnson

Nelson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 1998 · most notably Solmica of the Gulf Coast, Inc. v. Braggs (1970), Shelby County v. Baker (1959)

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

12019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Campbell v. State · Housing Authority v. Decatur Land Co. · Millar v. Town of Wilson · Eiland v. State · Louisville N. R. Co. v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test is the service in which the employee is engaged. . The rule which has been approved for determining whether certain conduct of an employee is within the line and scope of his employment is substantially that if an employee is engaged to perform a certain service, whatever he does to that end, or in furtherance of the employment, is deemed by law to be an act done within the scope of the employment. Id., at 427 , 88 So.2d at 361 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The extent of cross-examination on irrelevant facts, for the purpose of testing bias or credibility of the witness' testimony is a matter resting largely in the discretion of the trial court, and his ruling will not be disturbed unless it appears that he has abused his discretion to the prejudice of the complaining party."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.