Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 Ala. 86 - Moore v. Stephens

Moore v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Edgehill Corporation v. Hutchens (1968), Clarke v. Organ (1959)

33 state decisions

801956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edward Prigg v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Fretwell v. McLemore · Frei v. Brownlee · Rehn v. Bingaman · Davis v. Shepard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"All claims against the estate of a decedent . . . whether due or to become due, must be presented within six months after the grant of letters testamentary or of administration; and if not presented within that time, they are forever barred and the payment or allowance thereof is prohibited. . . ."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"All claims whether absolute or conditional, whether payable presently or in the future, are within the statute. [Citations omitted.] It is only contingent claims—claims which may never accrue—that fall within the provision postponing a presentation `until eighteen months after the same have accrued;' such as the liability of a surety who has no demand against the principal until his payment of the debt for which he is bound."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “". . . the statute of nonclaim is clear and unambiguous and `must be construed to mean just what the words import', and the words `all claims against the estate of the decedent' should be construed to include all claims not specifically excepted, and thus to include tort claims."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.