Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 ARK 862 - Cardwell v. State

Cardwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1982
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Erickson · United States v. Marshall · Blake v. State · United States v. Amidzich · United States v. Castro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) The prosecuting attorney may perform these obligations in any manner mutually agreeable to himself and defense counsel or by: (i) notifying defense counsel that material and information, described in general terms, may be inspected, obtained, tested, copied, recorded or photographed, during specified reasonable times; or; (ii) making available to defense counsel at a time specified such material and information, and suitable facilities and arrangements for inspection, testing, copying, recording or photographing of such material and information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.