Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 CONN 286 - Leonard v. Commissioner

Leonard v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

4 district · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably In re Samantha C. (2004), Blumenthal v. Kimber Manufacturing, Inc. (2003)

4 district · 46 state decisions

320200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 7454

Relies on Kilduff v. Adams, Inc. · Weisman v. Kaspar · Smith v. Smith · United Illuminating Co. v. City of New Haven · Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Fraud and misrepresentation cannot be easily defined because they can be accomplished in so many different ways. They present, however, issues of fact. ... The trier of facts is the judge of the credibility of the testimony and of the weight to be accorded it. ... When the trial court finds that a plaintiff has proven all of the essential elements of fraud, its decision will not be reversed or modified unless it is clearly erroneous in light of the evidence and the pleadings in the record as a whole. ... A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence in the record to support it ... or when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. ... [A]s a reviewing court [w]e must defer to the trier of fact's assessment of the credibility of the witnesses that is made on the basis of its firsthand observation of their conduct, demeanor and attitude. ... The weight to be given to the evidence and to the credibility of witnesses is solely within the determination of the trier of fact. ... In reviewing factual findings, [w]e do not examine the record to determine whether the [court] could have reached a conclusion other than the one reached. ... Instead, we make every reasonable presumption ... in favor of the trial court's ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the common law ... it is well settled that the essential elements of fraud are: (1) a false representation was made as a statement of fact; (2) it was untrue and known to be untrue by the party making it; (3) it was made to induce the other party to act upon it; and (4) the other party did so act upon that false representation to his injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.