Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 F.1d 376 - United States v. Windham

United States v. Windham’s Empirical Analysis

264 F. 376 · 1920

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 1951
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1951

8 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

1901920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Taking the new statute as a whole, its provisions would appear to cover and provide for the punishment of every act which could be punished under the former provisions of the Revised Statutes with regard to the manufacture and sale of liquors for beverage purposes. To hold that the old law is continued would therefore be to hold that two inconsistent sets of statutory provisions, punishing the same substantial act, and with differing penalties, were of force, and that a person could be prosecuted and punished under section 3 and section 6 of the new statute for transporting any liquor •at all, without the required permit, and at the same time prosecuted and punished under thé provisions of section 3296 for transporting liquor without having previously paid the tax that he is forbidden by law to pay.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Nor shall this act relieve any person from any liability, civil or criminal, heretofore or hereafter incurred under existing laws.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.