Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 F.1d 61 - Boise v. Talcott

Boise v. Talcott’s Empirical Analysis

264 F. 61 · 1920

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
September 1976
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 1976

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

130192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zartman v. First National Bank · Oil Co. v. Van Etten · Greey v. Dockendorff · Sexton v. Kessler & Co. · First Nat. Bank of New Kensington v. Pennsylvania Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “James Talcott Factor for Daly & Schaefer,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.