Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 264 F.1d 761 - Parkerson v. Borst

Parkerson v. Borst’s Empirical Analysis

264 F. 761 · 1920

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2010

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

901920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parkerson v. Borst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the operation of the inflexible and overshadowing ra!es of law, the attempted transaction * * * with Mrs. Borst's securities lost the form of action, became sterile, and was in law as though it had not been.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.